Brett Kavanaugh Pushes Back Against Criticism Of 1 Controversial Supreme Court Practice

5 months ago 10
ARTICLE AD BOX

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday pushed back against criticism over the high court’s limited explanation for decisions made on an emergency basis, many of which have served President Donald Trump’s agenda of overhauling the federal government.

In an appearance in Kansas City, Missouri, before the judicial conference of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, reported by multiple news outlets, Kavanaugh seemed to distance himself from comments made by his liberal colleague Elena Kagan last week when she said the court should exercise more caution when deciding cases on emergency appeal.

“Courts are supposed to explain things,” Kagan said. “I think as we have done more and more on this emergency docket, there becomes a real responsibility that I think we didn’t recognize when we first started down this road, to explain things better.”

But Kavanaugh offered a differing view.

“There can be a risk, in writing the opinion, of a lock-in effect, of making a snap judgment and putting it in writing, in a written opinion that’s not going to reflect the final view,” he said.

The court has in recent weeks handed the Trump administration several wins, including approving the president’s plan to dismantle the Department of Education and allowing him to fire Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission who were removed by Trump and then reinstated in their positions by a federal judge.

As those cases were emergency appeals, the court offered little to no explanation behind its decisions. Cases on the so-called shadow docket are “handled on an expedited basis with limited briefing and typically no oral argument, and the court often resolves them in unsigned orders with little or no explanation,” according to SCOTUSblog.

Meanwhile, Kavanaugh said he is not oblivious to the “ocean of criticism and critiques out there” about the court.

20 Years OfFreeJournalism

Your Support Fuels Our Mission

Your Support Fuels Our Mission

For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can't do this without you.

We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.

Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.

We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.

Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.

Support HuffPost

Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.

“I definitely pay attention to it. I think you have to. We’re public officials who serve the American people. It’s not an academic exercise,” the conservative justice said. “It’s important for maintaining public confidence in the judiciary and the Supreme Court to know how the opinions are being conveyed and received and understood by the American people.”

While Kavanaugh recognized the pressure federal judges across the country face, the Trump-nominated justice made no reference to the president’s own relentless attacks on those who rule against his administration.

“I just want all the judges in the room to know how much I appreciate what they do,” Kavanaugh said. “It’s a lot to deal with all the things that are coming at you.”

Read Entire Article